THE UNDISPUTED GUIDE TO MAKING TEA
home
about
bewildering music
wp show/hide comments
flickr my flickr site
May 21, 2007
good show = good times

well there was a great show tonight at dangerous curve in los angeles. the all-star line up: lloyd rodgers group, brother mallard, and paul bailey ensemble. pbe premiered the new vocal piece “life’s too short” and it was really great. i’ll be posting some photos when i figure out which box has my usb stick.

in a few weeks i’ll be moving to nyc to finish up my dissertation, it should be interesting and hopefully i’m post about that.

posted @ 5:06 am Comments (0)


No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

May 8, 2007
frank zappa on crossfire

i found this clip of cnn’s crossfire from 1986. robert novak is the co-host, who represents the views of the right (not surprising considering his role in the valerie plame scandal)

the discussion is over some proposed legislation that rock music should be censored by the government because the lyrics are “advocating” a lack of morality such as incest.

zappa makes an interesting comment about how the ronald regan administration is pushing the country toward a fascist theocracy. i guess he was right.

Frank Zappa on Crossfire

posted @ 5:51 pm Comments (1)


1 Comment »

  1. Can you provide me the link. I wanted to asked about Frank Zappa because my father like him a lot. And he would be glad if i will get to show him the link. Thanks.

    Comment by Phentermine Online — October 20, 2007 @ 5:17 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

May 5, 2007
stimulating

i hate you john zorn for making free-improv “avant-garde” jazz synonymous with downtown, cool, hip, and artsy.

it’s not!

and maybe also for stealing from butch morris.

maybe it’s the kids faults for buying into such crap.

or maybe i am too blind to see the light! but then again….i saw zorn play once, a 10 minute set at the tonic bar (no longer exists by the way, maybe the pack of rats crossing in front of you as you walked up the street to the place was a turn off? maybe it was just that they were priced-out like everyone) and it was, at best, saxophone masturbation. the stone isn’t any better, unless you like second-rate wannabe zornites.

as i look for a place to live in nyc, i decided to check out timeout to see whats going on in the desolate place known as bushwick…here’s two quotes:

this is a show at the bushwick starr:

“Tonight this new experimental series in Bushwick features trumpeter Peter Evans, a remarkable improviser with relentless breath flow and extreme timbral audacity. ”

mm…timbral fetish at it’s best i’m sure.

and then at goodbye blue monday:

“Saris—the duo of percussionist Harris Eisenstadt and bassoonist Sara Schoenbeck, joined tonight by trumpeter Nate Wooley—headline what’s sure to be a stimulating night of avant-jazz and free improv.”

more stimulating than a night at the opera—that’s probably true.

posted @ 6:13 pm Comments (1)


1 Comment »

  1. Timbral audacity? Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.

    Did timeout list the venue as “out-of-town”?

    Comment by Carl — May 6, 2007 @ 2:09 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

May 1, 2007
john cage on tv, 1960

anyone seen this before?


John Cage on TV

check it out. as my boyfriend says, “it puts john cage in context.”

posted @ 5:13 am Comments (1)


1 Comment »

  1. Thanks for sharing this one. I have not watch .Awesome video, he really didn’t get on TV a lot.Mr. Cage is known on the old television game show I’ve Got a Secret. Is it true that the union causes the show to closed down?.

    Comment by Phentermine Online — October 20, 2007 @ 5:26 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

April 12, 2007
the eschatology of classical music

this was originally going to be a brief response to a post on paul bailey’s blog (which is actually more of a response that should be directed to daniel wolf’s recent postings on the death of classical music) but it’s too long so i’m just going to put it here:

i don’t want to be associated with “classical music”. classical music has always meant elitism and music for the select few. i’ve never believed in music for only those who can afford it.

if people believe technology is destroying classical music, they are just missing the mark. which i think is what daniel wolf is arguing against, as well. but he comes from the defense since he believes that classical music is still alive and calls himself a “classical composer”.

classical music is dead because the canon has been codified and the list of key players has been set in stone. it cannot be changed or altered. the german composers are the masters and that is that. the 19th century attitude toward music, evolution, and people has not changed in regard to classical music or musicology, which cannot survive without the classical music canon.

i don’t know why someone would want to call themselves a “classical composer”. why not just call yourself a composer? or a musician? when someone attends an opera house or a concert hall like the disney hall, and listens to a performance of beethoven’s fifth or see a performance of la traviata, what they are doing is paying to go to a museum. the canon is simply a collection of musical objects that can be put on display for the elite who can afford to see it. there is nothing alive about it.

remember, the opera house was originally about rich people wanting to show off to each other how much wealth they had by the location of their box seat subscription. the opera show was nothing more than a decadent spectacle. that has not changed. what has changed is that people actually believe that an opera is something enlightening and something to be revered.

music is not being made in the concert hall or opera house. new ideas are not being promoted. new voices are not being heard. why not? because what you have to say is worthless because you are not bach, beethoven, mozart, mahler, or anyone from the 19th century musical canon. and if you are allowed to speak, you must be convoluted and unintelligible. i think classical music is really a tragedy when you think about it in terms of its ability to stiffen and suppress. everyone has the right to make music and be heard. the classical music establishment does not allow this.

i don’t want to be a part of the museum. i’m not dead.

posted @ 4:51 pm Comments (4)


4 Comments »

  1. hi nice site.

    Comment by alex — April 13, 2007 @ 6:25 pm

  2. Please pay attention to how those with the greatest investment in a closed canon of classical music are running away as fast as possible from the name, in search of another label (postclassic, or cross-over, or neo-classic or whatever).

    But the term is useful, and I like classical musics — whether it’s Javanese Karawitan or Karnatic music or music from the west coast experimental tradition, all of which share the quality that they are not interested in a finished product so much as the process of clarifying what exactly a music might be. This is the opposite of the commodification processs that can be heard in a top-40 hit, or in the work of any musician promoted by one of the classical management agencies. That’s dead music, and anything but classical.

    Comment by Daniel Wolf — April 15, 2007 @ 9:20 am

  3. a rose by any other name would still smell as sweet.

    i might be wrong, but i think cross-over is just another way to make more money without quality. i’ve only recently heard of the term when i attend a phd student’s talk on cross-over.

    i don’t mind the use of the word “classic.” when i was in england, i played in a gamelan and we played a lot of pieces from the degung classic repertoire. playing that music versus playing music of the western classic canon is quite different, not just musically but also within the context of society.

    you are right about the commodification of music. if you say that isn’t classical, then what about the music in the classical music section of a virgin megastore? certainly the latest and hippest recording of mozart violin sonatas, with the picture of a hot chick on the cover is classical, isn’t it?

    Comment by Veronica — April 15, 2007 @ 4:03 pm

  4. Cool site - nicely done. One little quibble - the “opera house” was not originally about rich people… the Venetian opera houses (the original “opera house”) were full of mass spectacle, and quite pop in terms of maximizing elements that could sell tickets. The origins of opera as a genre, on the other hand… all about rich people (started off in courts - no access by the common folk…).

    Recognizing that “classical” is a construct is important - if we teach our selves, our students, and our friends that all musics ferment in the societies that produce them, then our trip to the museum can be more fulfilling, as it can help us reflect on the purpose of the music(s) we produce now. That’s what a museum is supposed to do, right - provide context for our current culture?

    Comment by Norris — May 31, 2007 @ 8:12 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Next Page »